Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust - Recent Media Attention
Table of Contents
Holocaust survivor's miracle escape after being set to gas chamber
Many people in the west are apparently waking up and taking issue with the mainstream holocaust narrative, such as how it is that many millions of alleged holocaust victims can be expunged from the official death records whilst the "6 million" figure is still promoted as fact.
Another indicator that people are becoming aware of The Big Lie is the legislation which has been introduced in many countries which make it illegal to question the official holocaust narrative, even in the United States and even when that narrative is in the form of forensic evidence presented in a court room. As Kevin Alfred Strom said, "To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?".
YouTube is another example of the mass awakening. The purging there has been going on for years, but the latest push to remove content and ban users which are critical of Israel or those who challenge the holocaust narrative seems to be far more aggressive as of late. That this purging is occurring is not necessarily a bad thing since those who wish to continue publishing are forced to use alternative platforms, many of which are less prone to censorship, such as BitChute, Odysee, altCensored and many others.
Speaking of historical fact, let's talk a bit about 89 year old Ruzena Levy (assuming that's her real name) whose incredible story popped up recently in the UK Daily Express under the title, Holocaust survivor's miracle escape after being set to gas chamber. Ruzena's experience is similar to that of Irene Zisblatt whose story was printed in the Miami Herald as well as many other publications. In fact, the stories of the two women are uncannily similar. Let's consider some of the similarities:
Both were sent to the Auschwitz 'death camp': Check!
Both are examined by Dr. Mengele, the 'Angel of Death': Check!
Both survive their encounters with Dr. Mengele: Check!
Both are summoned to the gas chamber by Dr. Mengele: Check!
Both manage to avoid the gas chamber: Check!
Both survive the Auschwitz 'death camp': Check!
Both are sent on a 'death march' to another camp: Check!
Both survive the 'death march' by digging up food: Check!
Both profit by selling their story to school children: Check!
Both are provably full of shit: Check!
Those that haven't studied the Jewish holocaust beyond what they were told in school or through Hollywood films, may chalk up these similarities as coincidence however i assure you they are not. In fact, many of the same holocaust cliches appear again and again in the testimonies of alleged holocaust survivors.
Unlike the story of Irene Zisblatt however, Holocaust survivor escaped with gems, which was so outlandish that the Miami Herald deleted its own article from its website and even some mainstream holocaust historians seem to have viewed it as an embarrassment, Ruzena Levy avoids regurgitating all of the same false claims. In fact the very short story that appeared on the Daily Express website is largely devoid of any significant detail, including times, dates and even places. It seems the template for alleged holocaust survivors has been paired down to the barest of essentials these days, perhaps to limit the debunking of the fairy tales. For example, absent from Levy's story are the false claims of soap manufactured from the fat of dead Jews, human skin lampshades, Jews being locked in cages with eagles and bears, shrunken heads, Nazis tearing babies in half with their bare hands, human bones used to pave the Autobahn, etc., etc., etc..
Secrets of The Dead - Bugging Hitler's Soldiers
On May 2nd, 2013, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) published the documentary film Secrets of The Dead: Bugging Hitler's Soldiers on their website. The film documents a secret bugging operation of high ranking World War II German military prisoners that were held by the British. Over 100,000 hours of audio recordings are are said to have been captured by MI19, the division of British intelligence who bugged the elaborate homes in which the prisoners were held. We are told that the audio tapes were transcribed, translated and sent directly to Winston Churchill. There are several factual inaccuracies presented in the film and one notably large omission. Here is a link to the transcript of the film for reference.
The foremost problem is one of authenticity; the original recordings were destroyed, we are told, which is decidedly convenient as it is now impossible to verify whether what was recorded actually matches the transcripts. It is also worth pointing out that most of the personnel monitoring the listening equipment were Jewish refuges from Germany. Why British intelligence would task Jewish refuges with gathering possibly vital information from key military personal, of which many were generals, from the very people who persecuted them is nearly unfathomable to me. We are told the reason is because of their familiarity with the German language. Are we really being asked to believe there were no non-Jewish, German speaking personnel in British intelligence capable of doing the work? If that was the case, British intelligence must have had a very difficult time translating the hoards of other German communications that were intercepted.
The film refers to the former Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany as a death camp, which it was not. Both mainstream holocaust historians and revisionists agree that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Buchenwald. The film also repeats the malicious and long debunked claim that lampshades were made from tattooed human skin (references: 1, 2, 3, 4).
During the film the viewer is presented with a very well known -- and a very forged -- photograph of prisoners in a bunk house at Buchenwald:
The original photograph, published in the May 6th, 1945 edition of The New York Times Magazine, is somewhat less dramatic:
One of the most important aspects of the film was not what it contained, but what it omitted. At no time are gas chambers mentioned, homicidal or otherwise. I don't think there can be any doubt whatsoever that PBS would have showcased any hint of homicidal gas chambers had a single one of the German prisoners referred to them among the 100,000+ hours of audio tape. It would seem there was little chance that any conversation about gas chambers could have been missed since, as we are told, "MI19 specially designed microphones reached everywhere; nothing was out of range.", and "We knew that the microphones must have been of very high quality because we could hear the prisoners very clearly and even if they whispered to their cell mate it was very often possible to pick up what they said.".
It is always well worth questioning the integrity of mainstream media. One could begin by questioning who owns the very few companies that control approximately 80-90% of everything we read, watch and listen to. Who are the board members and what relationships with other institutions do they have? As with my article about NPR, the conflicts of interest present within PBS are blatantly obvious, including ties to the National Security Agency (NSA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Obama for America, Polaris Government Relations and several other companies, institutions and foundations. Among the board members of PBS is Sharon Percy Rockefeller who is a member of the Bilderberg Group. The Bilderberg Group is sort of a private club, not unlike the Bohemian Club, whose members rank among the worlds richest and most powerful people on the planet and include heads of state, future presidents and prominent politicians, media representatives, bankers and others, many of whom are Jewish. These so-called "elite" people practice some very weird and alarming rituals during their annual meeting including the burning of an effigy in front of a 40 ft. owl. Their agenda, the content of their meetings and even the guest list are kept secret, though more is being learned about this elite club with the advent of the internet.
As with National Public Radio, one may wonder where the "public" is in the Public Broadcasting Service, an organization that, very much like NPR, is funded in part by the the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the government and various foundations and private corporations. The public media watchdog organization, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), has published several articles critical of PBS, including Problems at PBS, From Rose to Koch, PBS Drone Coverage Brought to You by Drone Makers, PBS Goes to Israel and Palestine-Mostly Israel, PBS Reports Iran Nuke Claims as Facts and many others.
Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine
One of the "proofs" offered in support of the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Treblinka appeared in the form of several tiles which were uncovered. Colls stated in the documentary that the tiles reminded her of the Star of David that survivors said they saw as they entered the building. The claims that 1), the Star of David is present on the tiles and 2), that it would have been visible to prisoners are both provably false.
Referring to the image below, it is immediately apparent that the "Star of David" is not a Star of David. Secondly, the viewer will notice several rows of rounded bumps on the tile. These bumps are placed on the bottom of the tile for cementing purposes and therefore the "Star of David" would not have been visible to anyone.
The untruths regarding the tiles that were presented by Colls' team and the Smithsonian were quickly exposed by historical revisionists. Adding to the embarrassment of the "forensic archaeologist" and the Smithsonian is an article, titled Smithsonian Red-Faced after "Treblinka Star of David Tiles" Shown to be Not Jewish At All. From the article:
"Now for the first time, Caroline and her team have hard evidence confirming the existence of the gas chambers," the narrator adds.
Unfortunately for the Smithsonian, Colls and Schute, the "Star of David" to which they refer is nothing of the sort.
Firstly, the symbol-a six pointed solid star, with a dot in its center, surrounded by a circle, and with a clear "D" letter to its right, is imprinted on the back of the tile-which means that wherever it would have been placed, the symbol would have been cemented onto the floor, and would not have been visible.
This makes Colls's claim that the symbol was there to "make people think they were going somewhere safe" complete nonsense.
And then there is the alleged "mass grave" site where Colls's team performed minor excavations then suddenly decided to stop after uncovering only 40 bones because, we are told, they were sure of the hell they would unearth had they continued. What was largely and carefully hidden from the viewers is that this "mass grave" appears to be a clearly marked Christian cemetery that was just beyond the Treblinka camp border, however this apparently had no impact on their decision to desecrate the site in their silly efforts to convince the gullible viewer that Treblinka functioned solely as a mass extermination center rather than the transit and work camp as the evidence dictates.
For a thorough breakdown of the hoax perpetrated by Caroline Sturdy Colls and the Smithsonian Institute, watch The Treblinka Archaeology Hoaxby Eric Hunt.